Search results for "pop"

After the death of the King of Pop Michael Jackson very surprising news came into picture. Yes, Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children!  Even Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother, a all three children were conceived in vitro which means outside the womb. Sources say Michael was not the sperm donor for any of them and to top it off, Debbie's eggs were not used. (I must say it keeps getting juicer as time goes by, what else are we going to find out?) She was just the surrogate, and was paid extremely well for the births of Michael Jr. and Paris. If we remember correctly only three days after Prince was born Jackson's lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael. I guess she was paid well because what mother who loves her child will allow that?

But it gets more complicated, because even though Debbie is not the biological mother, she was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born and there's a belief that she's the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence. There are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids, however it's still not clear. Onbly time and the courts will give us the answer we are all waiting for. Have a look on the pictures of Michael Jackson, son Prince and daughter Paris, leaving Tom's Toys in Beverly Hills. They look so happy, who will say Michael was not their father.

(Source: tmz.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-debbie-rowe-surrogate-children-in-vitro/)